Grassley Asks President to Drop Steel Safeguard Tariffs
WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Committee on Finance, today asked President Bush to eliminate the steel safeguard tariffs, saying the elimination would help to jump start the economic recovery of U.S. manufacturing and revitalize the global competitiveness of steel consuming businesses in Iowa and across the United States.
The text of Grassley’s letter to the President follows.
November 14, 2003
The Honorable George W. Bush
President of the United States of America
The White House
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. President:
I am writing to express my concerns, and the concerns of many Iowa businesses and workers, regarding the steel safeguard tariffs that have been in place since March 2002.
When you announced the decision to impose steel safeguard tariffs, you stated that the purpose of the tariffs was to provide temporary help to our steel industry so that the industry could restructure, thus ensuring its long-term competitiveness. Recently, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) completed its statutory midterm review of the steel safeguard tariffs. The ITC’s review makes clear that the steel industry in the United States has indeed experienced a significant restructuring. In addition, the United Steelworkers of America have negotiated ground breaking collective bargaining agreements with several U.S. producers. Those agreements are expected toserve as the basis for future labor agreements with other U.S. producers. Separately, the PensionBenefit Guaranty Corporation has assumed a substantial portion of the U.S. steel industry’s pensionobligations. Taken together, these actions help to ensure the long-term competitiveness of steelproducers in the United States.
The purpose of the steel safeguard tariffs has therefore been met, but this has come at a heavy cost. The ITC estimates that the steel safeguard tariffs have already cost U.S. businesses and workers over $680 million since their imposition. Critically, the brunt of that cost has fallen on the shoulders of the motor vehicle parts and steel fabrication industries. These businesses and their workers are already experiencing economic challenges, as reflected by the downturn in employment within U.S. manufacturing in general. We shouldn’t add to those challenges needlessly. I have heard personally from a number of Iowa manufacturers that have been hurt by the steel safeguardtariffs, and I attach letters they have written to me. These businesses employ thousands of Iowans.
Their survival is key to maintaining the fabric of the communities in which they operate. My constituents inform me that they have incurred significantly increased raw materials costs by virtue of the steel safeguard tariffs, and yet have been unable to recoup these extra costs due to the increasingly globalized nature of competition in their industries. The same is true for steel consuming businesses across the United States. In short, continuation of the steel safeguard tariffs jeopardizes the future prosperity and survival of these vital members of our economy.
Mr. President, under your leadership we have taken important steps to ensure therevitalization, strength, and competitiveness of the U.S. steel industry. I call on that sense ofleadership now to ensure the revitalization, strength, and competitiveness of U.S. manufacturingfirms that consume steel. To continue the steel safeguard tariffs now will only serve to threaten theviability of the customer base that the revitalized U.S. steel industry seeks to service. The substantial declines in employment within U.S. manufacturing constitute changed economic circumstances under which the steel safeguard tariffs will no longer be effective in helping to ensure the long-termcompetitiveness of the U.S. steel industry. Rather, they will undermine that very goal, and the futureeconomic and social costs of the steel safeguard tariffs will far outweigh the benefits. On the otherhand, elimination of the steel safeguard tariffs will help to jumpstart the economic recovery of ourmanufacturing sector and revitalize the global competitiveness of our steel consuming businessesin Iowa and across the United States.
There does remain an important role for our government to assist the U.S. steel industry.That is, to redouble our efforts to achieve successful conclusions to the ongoing negotiations on global steel overcapacity and steel subsidies being conducted under the auspices of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The long-term competitiveness of our steel industry will not be completely secured until inefficient and excess global capacity is eliminated and disciplines are imposed on the provision of government subsidies to steel producers. We need comprehensive and enforceable agreements that address these underlying problems facing a globalized steel industry. Such agreements will go a long way toward enhancing the prosperity of our own steel producers here in the United States.
Thank you for considering my concerns and those of my constituents as you determine theappropriate course of action to take with respect to the steel safeguard tariffs.
Charles E. Grassley
Next Article Previous Article