Grassley on the Bipartisan Agreement on Medicare Prescription Drugs
News Conference Statement of U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, of Iowa
Chairman – Senate Committee on Finance
Bipartisan Agreement on Prescription Drugs
Thursday, June 5, 2003
I’m glad to be here today, standing beside Sen. Baucus to announce a bipartisan agreement on prescription drugs and improving Medicare. This is truly a landmark moment for senior citizens. Ouragreement gets us one important step closer toward making drug coverage a permanent part of Medicare.The Finance Committee will mark up our joint bill one week from today. The Majority Leader iscommitted to passing Medicare improvement legislation, on a bipartisan basis, off the Senate floor by July4th. We both are committed to keeping this process bipartisan from start to finish. We all know seniors don’twant politics; they want prescription drugs.
Our agreement adds a comprehensive prescription drug benefit for all seniors in Medicare. The benefit is equal for everyone, both in traditional Medicare and in the enhanced Medicare we’re setting up.Let me be clear: seniors in all areas of the country, urban and rural, will have comprehensive coveragethrough traditional Medicare.
Enhanced Medicare – what we’re calling “Medicare Advantage” – will create new coordinated,integrated PPO plans, just like the Federal Employees Plan has today. Drug benefits will be affordable forall beneficiaries, regardless of which option they choose. For $35 per month starting in 2006, seniors willbe able to get comprehensive drug coverage, including both up-front and catastrophic protection. Lowincome seniors will get extra protection. And all seniors, starting next year, will get a prescription drugdiscount card that will save them between 15 and 25 percent on drugs.
Our agreement takes steps to secure the rural health safety net, by increasing reimbursements to struggling doctors and hospitals that serve seniors in states like Iowa and Montana. These policies will bepaid for with other program changes, not our reserve fund resources. Sen. Baucus and I also started thesenegotiations knowing that whatever we did on prescription drugs had to work in all areas of the country, andour plan does that.
Still, our bipartisan agreement won’t be all things to all people. Sen. Baucus and I have worked hardto strike the right balance, keeping our total spending under $400 billion and building on the good work ofother committee members, including Sens. Breaux, Frist, Snowe, Jeffords and Hatch. I also want to creditthe contributions of other committee Republicans, with whom I've been meeting on specifics since January,as well as those off the committee who have provided good policy guidance to get us to where we are today.Some will say $400 billion is not enough. I say it's not how much you spend, but how you spend it.
Sen. Baucus and I have worked hard to spend our resources wisely, making sure that the seniors, thetaxpayers, and doctors and hospitals are treated fairly and equitably. Our agreement does all three. I lookforward to releasing our joint mark on Tuesday, and to the committee’s consideration of the bipartisan billon Thursday.
Next Article Previous Article
- Crapo, Brady Introduce Bill to Protect Taxpayer Rights and Privacy
- Senate Democrats’ International Tax Proposal Receives Overwhelmingly Negative Feedback from U.S. Manufacturers and Innovators
- Democrats’ Tax Hikes Let China Win
- Finance Committee Republicans Demand Full, Open Process to Vet Reckless Tax-and-Spend Proposals
- Crapo, Brady Warn Administration’s OECD Position Undermines Congress’s Authority over U.S. Tax Law