Grassley Seeks Answers in Internet Sales Tax Debate
WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Committee of Finance, is seekinganswers to multiple questions in the debate over whether state and local governments should be ableto require taxes on certain sales made via the Internet.
Grassley and Sen. Max Baucus, lead Democrat on the Committee, this week wrote a letterto the Congressional Budget Office asking for economic data on how consumers, state and localgovernments and Internet businesses would fare under additional Internet sales taxes.
“The U.S. Supreme Court gave this issue to Congress,” Grassley said. “It’s up to us to decidewhether to let state and local governments require businesses to collect sales taxes on certain Internetpurchases. This is a big decision. It affects how much consumers pay when they order a book or asweater on-line. It affects how much money state and local governments collect for their publicinitiatives. It affects the bottom line of those doing business on the Internet. We have to go into thisdebate equipped with all of the facts.”
The Grassley-Baucus letter to the Congressional Budget Office asked for guidance on whichrelated economic issues can be addressed only through Internet tax policy and which can beaddressed through state and local governments independent of Internet tax policy. The senators alsoasked for an analysis of issues including:
< the equal treatment of consumers with Internet access and those without;
< the social benefits of Internet growth;
< the high compliance costs on Internet businesses of collecting sales taxes for state and localgovernments;
< and the loss of state and local government tax revenue via Internet sales.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that state and local governments can’t require out-of-statevendors to collect and remit sales tax on purchases made by their residents. However, the Court saidthat Congress could impose such a requirement. A limited moratorium on new sales taxes onelectronic commerce is set to expire in October.
“I’m looking forward to a thorough, scholarly analysis from the Congressional BudgetOffice,” Grassley said. “That will help us make the right decisions on this issue.”
The Grassley-Baucus letter follows.
May 1, 2001
Dan L. Crippen
Congressional Budget Office
Ford House Office Building, Room 402
2nd and D Streets, SW
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Director Crippen:
In the last several years, the Congress has had concern about the appropriate policy to pursueregarding state and local government taxation of sales over the internet. Although a state or localgovernment currently may collect sales tax on internet purchases by its residents, enforcement isdifficult and minimal revenue is collected. The Supreme Court has ruled that states and localgovernments cannot require remote sellers to collect and remit sales tax on purchases by theirresidents. The Court has, however, said that Congress could impose such a requirement.
The debate about the desirability of Congress giving state and local governments theauthority to require remote sellers to collect and remit sales tax has raised a variety of economicconcerns. It would be helpful to the Finance Committee’s consideration of the question to have astudy that evaluated the numerous economic concerns raised by both sides of the debate. Inparticular, the committee would like to know which concerns are consistent with conventionaleconomic theory and appear to be qualitatively important. In addition, it would help to understandwhich of the economic issues can only be addressed through internet tax policy and which can beaddressed by state and local governments independent of internet tax policy.
The economic issues addressed should include but not necessarily be limited to:
i efficiency issues including non-neutral taxation, interstate tax competition and of the public sector, and the social benefits from growth of the internet;
ii equity issues including equal treatment of consumers and the digital divide;
iii high compliance costs imposed on remote sellers required to collect taxes for stateand local governments;
iv the loss of state and local tax revenue;
v and the stability and growth characteristics of state and local tax systems.Thank you for your attention to this important issue. If you or your staff have questions aboutthis request, please contact Dean Zerbe or Pat Heck of the committee staff at 224-4515.
Charles E. Grassley
Next Article Previous Article