Grassley Learns Anthrax Clean-up Tops $23 Million So Far; EPA Says Final Cost Unknown
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Chuck Grassley, ranking member of the Committee on Finance, haslearned the cost of cleaning the anthrax from the Hart Senate Office Building and other Capitol Hillbuildings is already at more than $23 million, and the tab is still running, according to theEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA).
“That’s a lot of money,” Grassley said. “Unfortunately, the EPA’s response is so lacking incontext and answers to all my questions that it’s difficult for the taxpayers to judge whether theirmoney was used properly. The EPA’s work to make the Hart building safe is important, but so is afull accounting of how the agency handled the cost. I plan to learn more about the details of thisproject.”
Grassley just received an accounting of the clean-up costs from the EPA in response to hisJan. 18, 2002, request. The EPA said the Hart building is part of the “Capitol Hill Anthrax Site,which encompasses over thirty buildings.” The agency said clean-up work continues at otherbuildings, and it has “obligated over $23 million for this effort against an approved ceiling of $25million.” The agency said it will not know the final clean-up cost until all of the work is completed,and it receives the contractors’ bills. EPA did not provide information about the cost of cleaning uponly the Hart building, as requested.
Grassley said several other questions remain about the EPA’s use of contractors in the cleanupproject. The EPA did not answer whether contractors had to meet any performance measures --if there were any – or perform specific tasks to be paid. Also missing in the EPA’s response weredetails about how each contractor was paid, whether by the hour, per task, or per contract; and detailsabout food, housing and transportation costs.
The EPA’s response excluded “specific details on the type of service each contractor isproviding for the remediation,” as Grassley asked. Instead, the EPA provided general phrases suchas “clean-up contract,” “technical support contract,” and “supplies.” “Supplies could mean anythingfrom sponges to wash the walls or brooms to sweep the halls, to protective suits for workers or thechlorine dioxide gas to kill anthrax spores,” Grassley said.
Grassley said the further details he plans to seek about the clean-up include what proportionof the clean-up budget went to the Hart building versus other buildings in the Capitol Hill complex,and what other anthrax clean-up projects are ongoing. “The anthrax clean-up was a hugeundertaking,” Grassley said. “I hope the EPA exercised as much fiscal restraint as it could in gettingthe clean-up done.”
Attachment: the EPA’s response to Grassley’s inquiry
Next Article Previous Article
- Wyden Statement at Finance Committee Hearing on the Nominations of María Pagán and Chris Wilson to USTR, Brent Neiman and Joshua Frost to Treasury, and Samuel Bagenstos to HHS
- Wyden Urges Federal Review of Pharmacy Closures
- Wyden Statement at Finance Committee Hearing on Health Insurance Coverage
- Wyden Statement on Proposal to Ensure Wealthy Tax Cheats Pay Taxes Owed
- Wyden Statement at Finance Committee Hearing on the Nomination of Chris Magnus to Lead CBP